Yesterday on AM 1640 The Eagle, I discussed bullying, special-needs students, and the Lindsey Nicole Henry Scholarship program with education lawyer Bill Hickman. The conversation begins at the 55:00 mark here.
Be sure to tune in each weekday morning from 7:00 to 9:00 to hear my colleague Trent England. He has lots of interesting conversations with guests on a wide variety of issues (including school choice). You can listen online or on AM 1640 in this coverage area:
Friday, April 10, 2015
Freedom of conscience
Today in The Journal Record, Michael Carnuccio discusses what the owners of an Indiana pizzeria have in common with some special-needs students in Oklahoma.
Thursday, April 9, 2015
'Mothers express concern about Edmond North security'
Steve Gust has the story.
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Understanding public charter schools in one easy lesson
Patrick McGuigan's tutorial is here.
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
'The coalition of the medicore'
OCPA distinguished fellow Andrew Spiropoulos reminds us that "Oklahoma is the poster child for the problems of American public education."
Oklahoma dad says teacher preyed on his son
Courthouse News Service reports that "an Oklahoma school district covered up a female English teacher's repeated rapes of an eighth grader, the boy's father claims in court."
Former Tulsa teacher pleads guilty to lewd molestation
The News on 6 has the story.
Sunday, April 5, 2015
Oklahoma’s education system: Another reminder that socialism doesn’t work
![]() |
| Socialism's finest: the Trabant |
[This article by economist Gary Wolfram appeared in the May 2001 issue of Perspective, published by the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs. Dr. Wolfram (Ph.D., University of California Berkeley) is Munson Professor of Political Economy at Hillsdale College and a former member of the Michigan State Board of Education.]
In 1955 Milton Friedman wrote an article discussing the role of government in education, in which he made the salient point that there is a fundamental difference between arguing that government should provide education and that government should produce education. His position was that production of education through government schools could not be justified, even if there were reasons for government to subsidize education. This is where he introduced his proposal for providing vouchers for students to use for education that would be produced through the market system that produces most other goods and services.
Twenty-five years later, in 1980, he wrote that public schools were suffering from the malady of “an over-governed society.” In this article he pointed out the failures of K-12 education in the United States, and described the system as “an island of socialism in a free-market sea.” He argued that Dr. Max Gammon’s theory of bureaucratic displacement—that is, in a bureaucratic system increases in expenditure will be matched by falling production—“applies in full force to the effect of the increasing bureaucratization and centralization of the public school system in the United States.”
It is now more than 20 years later and we have allowed our education system to continue as a socialist system, when it has been obvious to us and the rest of the world that such a system is fundamentally flawed. The collapse of eastern European socialism was inevitable. It is only through consumer choice and a system where producers are rewarded for making efficient use of resources (and punished for making inefficient use of resources) that our standard of living will increase. The result of holding tight to the socialist model for production of education has been similar to the results the Soviets had with their production system—poor quality of product and shortages. The collapse of our educational system is just as inevitable as was the Soviet system.
Peter Brimelow has written of five classic symptoms of socialism: (1) politicized allocation of resources, (2) proliferating bureaucratic overhead, (3) chronic mismatching of supply and demand, (4) susceptibility to top-down panaceas, usually requiring more input, and (5) qualitative and quantitative collapse. The average reader will immediately be aware that this describes the state of K-12 education in Oklahoma and the rest of the United States as we enter the 21st century. Let’s take a closer look.
Saturday, April 4, 2015
Lankford urges Obama to support D.C. vouchers
[Guest post by Patrick B. McGuigan]
U.S. Sen. James Lankford, R-Oklahoma City, is part of a
bipartisan group chiding the Obama Administration for trying to kill a school
choice program benefiting children in the nation’s capital.
![]() |
| Sen. James Lankford |
Lankford has long supported choice. In an interview with
this reporter, he said, “Congress has direct oversight over the District of
Columbia. So as a Member of Congress, I can advocate for school choice in the
area where I have direct impact.” Lankford, in his first term in the Senate
after four highly effective years in the U.S. House, is chairman of the
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs
and Federal Management—with jurisdiction over the District of Columbia.
“When it comes to our children,” Lankford believes, “the
American people are eager to pursue policies that help kids thrive. Education
is about kids, not political parties. School choice allows parents to get kids
out of the small number of failing schools.”
A conservative statesman, Sen. Lankford seemed reluctant to
assail his Republican friends at the state Capitol in Oklahoma City. Even
though school choice is popular
among Oklahoma voters, the GOP-controlled legislature failed this year to pass
Education Savings Account legislation authored by state Sen. Clark Jolley,
R-Edmond, and state Rep. Jason Nelson, R-Oklahoma City. “Parents and local
elected officials should create and manage education policy,” Lankford said, “not
Washington.”
Well, yes. I am a commentator and a journalist, so let me
register some reflections and criticisms about the latest Republican failure to
defend and advance the stated Republican policy position.
Jolley's Senate Bill 609 would allow students to receive partial value for tax-financed education resources, in support of schooling at a place of parental (or guardian) choice. The idea, as with all school choice programs, is to have resources follow children, rather than institutions or bureaucracies.
Jolley's Senate Bill 609 would allow students to receive partial value for tax-financed education resources, in support of schooling at a place of parental (or guardian) choice. The idea, as with all school choice programs, is to have resources follow children, rather than institutions or bureaucracies.
After pulling his measure from the 2015 legislative
calendar, Jolley said “education savings accounts would enable more Oklahoma
parents to make that choice for their child by allowing them to use part of his
or her state education funding to pursue the schooling that best suits a
student's needs.
“Public schools would actually see an
increase in per-pupil revenue as a result of this plan. Other states
already offer this option for education, and I am convinced this would enhance
our efforts to improve education levels in our state.”
To be sure, Jolley’s bill can be revisited during the 2016
legislative session. Still, the result is notable. For the second year in a
row, school choice legislation was pulled from the calendar in a
Republican-controlled Legislature.
Meanwhile, back in the nation’s capital, Sens. Ron Johnson,
R-Wisconsin, Dianne Feinstein, D-California, and Tim Scott, R-South Carolina,
joined Lankford in pushing to retain the Opportunity Scholarship Program. In a
missive to President Obama, the quartet detailed shared concerns over his
decision. Their joint letter read:
We were disappointed to learn your budget proposal cut funding for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program and terminated future funding for this life-changing program.
Public schools in the District of Columbia are some of the worst in the nation. The high school four-year graduation rate in the district is only 59 percent. Only half of the district’s public school children are proficient in reading. This track record is in spite of spending almost $30,000 per pupil.
The D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program provides scholarships for children of low-income households in the district to attend schools that their families otherwise could never possibly afford. Because the enrollment wait list for D.C. Public Charter Schools totals more than 22,000 applicants, disadvantaged Washington students have limited options in the district’s public schools. For many Washington students, the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program is the only hope for an opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.
The average household income for students receiving scholarships under the program is below $21,000—in a city with some of the highest costs of living in the nation. Two-thirds of these children come from families that receive food stamps and/or aid from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. Ninety-seven percent of the children who benefit from this program are African American, Hispanic and/or Latino.
Despite the socioeconomic challenges facing these students, 90 percent of students who earn scholarships through the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program graduate from high school, and almost all of those students go on to attend college. The program’s success and popularity among Washington families is reflected in the more than 3,600 applications received for the 2014-2015 school year. Simply stated, this program works.
We therefore urge you to support the full, continuous funding of a program that is proven to transform the lives of thousands of Washington children, the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program.
The four senators together reflect the diversity of support
for school choice in modern America.
Put one way, the group includes two while males (Lankford
and Johnson), a black male (Scott), and a female Democrat (Feinstein).
Put another way, the group includes a Jew (Feinstein), a Southern Baptist (Lankford), a Lutheran (Johnson), and an Evangelical (Scott).
Put still another way, these four represent the future, a bipartisan answer to what many have called the most important civil rights issue of the 21st century—education for minorities, and for us all.
Which side of the argument over school choice will Oklahoma Republicans choose? An inclusive future, or a monopoly-driven past?
Put still another way, these four represent the future, a bipartisan answer to what many have called the most important civil rights issue of the 21st century—education for minorities, and for us all.
Which side of the argument over school choice will Oklahoma Republicans choose? An inclusive future, or a monopoly-driven past?
No reform allowed, just send money
"This week’s education rally may have provided an unintended lesson on how not to win friends and influence people," The Oklahoman editorialized today.
Participants lobbied for increased school funding. Rep. Lee Denney, R-Cushing, has sought to earmark additional money to schools. So how did the assembled teachers and administrators respond when Denney addressed them? The Associated Press reported that Denney “drew boos and was heckled repeatedly after she mentioned charter schools in her speech.” In contrast, House Democratic Leader Rep. Scott Inman of Del City was cheered as he urged participants to vote out politicians who fail to pass bills like Denney’s funding measure. So: A Democrat who criticizes lawmakers for failing to pass a Republican’s school-funding bill is treated like a hero, while the author of that funding bill is treated like a leper? Apparently, supporting a $600 million increase in school funding, as Denney has, isn’t enough for the union groups that dominated the rally. You must also oppose implementing any education change, no matter how slight, especially new approaches that generate dramatically improved results among low-income students, as charter schools have done.
Labels:
Bottomless Pit,
Charter Schools,
Labor Unions
Friday, April 3, 2015
Is $8,804 per pupil enough?
Let me say right up front that we don’t know how much money the government spends on education. "Nobody knows, not even the principal," as scholars Chester Finn and Michael Petrilli put it. "That’s how opaque our system is."
"Because of the various funding streams that feed the system," adds Jonathan Butcher of the Goldwater Institute, "discovering exactly how much taxpayers spend per student is more like deciphering a riddle than reading a balance sheet."
Public school finances "make Enron look like a model of transparency," says University of Arkansas education professor Robert Maranto. "Under our highly complex systems of school finance and resource allocations, policy-makers, educators, and taxpayers simply do not know what if any strategy drives particular spending decisions, or how costs and outcomes compare across programs. In public education we are all, quite literally, flying blind."
But for now let's go with per-pupil funding of $8,804, the latest number for Oklahoma provided by the National Education Association. Whether Oklahoma ranks 1st or 50th in education funding, it seems to me that $8,804 per pupil ought to be enough to deliver a quality education. It certainly seems to be enough in Oklahoma’s private schools, which charge roughly $4,500 on average at elementary schools and $6,900 for high school.
Thursday, April 2, 2015
Bill would allow OKC, Tulsa to sponsor charter schools
Senate Bill 68 by Sen. David Holt and Rep. Jason Nelson would give the cities of Oklahoma City and Tulsa the power to authorize charter schools, which could give a boost to urban revitalization efforts. Sen. Holt discusses the measure here.
The bill passed the Oklahoma Senate by a margin of 35-8 and will be considered on Monday in the House Common Education Committee at 3:00. The members of the Committee and their email addresses are listed below.
- Rep. Ann Coody (R): anncoody@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Michael Rogers (R): michael.rogers@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Ed Cannaday (D): ed.cannaday@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Chad Caldwell (R): chad.caldwell@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Donnie Condit (D): donnie.condit@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Dan Fisher (R): dan.fisher@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Katie Henke (R): katie.henke@okhouse.gov
- Rep. John Paul Jordan (R): jp.jordan@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Sally Kern (R): sallykern@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Jeannie McDaniel (D): jeanniemcdaniel@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Jadine Nollan (R): jadine.nollan@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Shane Stone (D): shane.stone@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Chuck Strohm (R): chuck.strohm@okhouse.gov
- Rep. Todd Thomsen (R): todd.thomsen@okhouse.gov
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
Four Oklahoma school threats reported last month
News 9 has the story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


